Risk-adjusted returns measure the performance of an investment after accounting for the level of risk taken to achieve those returns — enabling a fair comparison between investments with different risk profiles. A fund that generates 20% annual returns by concentrating in highly volatile small-cap stocks is not necessarily superior to a fund delivering 15% with much lower volatility — the risk-adjusted return comparison reveals which fund provides more reward per unit of risk. The most widely used risk-adjusted return metrics include the Sharpe Ratio (excess return per unit of total volatility), the Sortino Ratio (excess return per unit of downside volatility only), and the Treynor Ratio (excess return per unit of market beta risk). In Indian mutual fund evaluation, risk-adjusted returns are essential for comparing funds within the same category — particularly across equity fund categories where return dispersion between top and bottom performers is wide but risk levels also differ significantly. SEBI requires disclosure of beta and standard deviation in mutual fund scheme performance documents, enabling sophisticated investors to calculate risk-adjusted metrics. For long-term wealth creation, Indian investors should seek funds that consistently deliver superior risk-adjusted returns rather than simply chasing the highest absolute returns — the latter approach often leads to purchasing high-volatility funds at peak valuations, resulting in poor actual investor outcomes despite impressive headline performance numbers.