The growth of the Indian financial and stockbroking sector has resulted in a significant increase in professional engagements. Stockbroking firms and financial intermediaries frequently engage legal advisors, auditors, compliance specialists, consultants, and technology providers. In such scenarios, Section 194J of the Income Tax Act plays a vital role in regulating tax collection at the source.
Section 194J mandates the deduction of tax at source (TDS) on specific professional and technical service payments. Its objective is twofold: to ensure timely tax collection and to reduce instances of tax evasion. For stockbroking entities, correct application of this provision is more than just a statutory formality. It is a matter of fostering credibility with regulators, investors, and professional partners while avoiding avoidable financial penalties.
This article provides a comprehensive explanation of Section 194J, covering its scope, applicability, the 194J TDS rate, the 194J limit, compliance procedures, and practical examples to support understanding.
Section 194J relates specifically to TDS for professional fees, technical services, royalty payments, director’s fees (other than salary), and non-compete agreements. It applies where a resident entity makes a payment to another resident professional or service provider.
In the context of the stockbroking industry, this means payments to auditors, compliance consultants, law firms, financial advisors, IT developers, and even directors for professional duties will fall within its ambit. It is therefore an indispensable section for entities engaged in regulated financial services.
The scope of Section 194J is broad. It covers the following categories of payments:
In stockbroking, activities like compliance audits, risk management software licensing, advisory services, and director’s commission squarely fall within Section 194J.
The obligation to deduct TDS for professional fees under Section 194J rests on:
In stockbroking firms, the compliance or finance team usually manages this responsibility. Timely deduction and deposit of TDS are critical, as lapses can invite interest and penalties.
The rates under Section 194J differ depending on the nature of payment and whether the recipient has provided a valid PAN.
| Nature of Payment | 194J TDS Rate (FY 2025-26) | PAN Provided | PAN Not Provided |
| Professional Fees | 10% | 10% | 20% |
| Technical Services | 2% | 2% | 20% |
| Director’s Remuneration | 10% | 10% | 20% |
| Royalty Payments | 10% | 10% | 20% |
The 194J limit, or threshold, defines the minimum annual payment beyond which TDS becomes applicable.
Earlier, the limit was ₹30,000, but the Finance Act 2025 raised it to ₹50,000 with effect from April 1, 2025.
Compliance is not limited to deduction alone. Timely deposit and accurate filing are equally important.
For stockbroking entities, where multiple professional payments occur each quarter, these deadlines form the backbone of financial compliance.
Failure to comply with Section 194J requirements can have serious repercussions:
Thus, strict compliance is not only a statutory obligation but also an effective safeguard against unnecessary financial exposure.
There are specific cases where Section 194J does not apply:
Confusion often arises between Section 194J, Section 194C, and Section 195.
| Feature | Section 194J | Section 194C | Section 195 |
| Payment Type | Professional / Technical services | Contractual “work” | Payments to Non-residents |
| Typical Rate | 2% or 10% | 1% or 2% | 20% or DTAA rates |
| Applicability | Resident professionals | Contractors / subcontractors | Non-resident entities |
| Threshold | ₹50,000 (FY 2025-26) | ₹30,000 / ₹1 lakh aggregate | No minimum threshold |
This distinction is particularly relevant in stockbroking where payments may fall under different sections based on the type of contract.
To simplify adherence, deductors should maintain a structured checklist:
Example 1: Broking audit engagement
ABC Stock Broking Pvt Ltd pays ₹60,000 to an audit firm in June 2025. As the payment exceeds the 194J limit of ₹50,000, the firm must deduct TDS at 10% (₹6,000) and deposit it by July 7.
Example 2: Software licensing fees
XYZ Broking House pays ₹40,000 in FY 2025-26 for a software licence. Since the total annual payment does not exceed ₹50,000, no TDS deduction is required.
Example 3: Director’s commission
PQR Securities pays its director a commission of ₹20,000 monthly. This totals ₹2,40,000 annually. TDS at 10% applies to every payment, as director’s remuneration has no threshold exemption.
Section 194J serves as a cornerstone of India’s TDS framework, particularly relevant for stockbroking entities and allied businesses. It ensures transparency, accountability, and consistent revenue collection for the exchequer.
For deductors, mastery over its provisions is non-negotiable. Understanding the scope of professional services, applying the correct 194J TDS rate, observing the 194J limit, and adhering to deadlines form the basis of sound compliance. In an environment of growing regulatory oversight, attention to detail in Section 194J compliance not only prevents penalties but also strengthens the organisation’s credibility with stakeholders