From Cost Optics to Value Reality in Mutual Funds
For years, the mutual fund debate in India was amplified to:
Regular = Expensive
Direct = Cheaper
Fintech platforms extrapolated this narrative by highlighting TER differences while offering free execution, tracking, and analytics. The message was clear: “Why pay more?”
Earlier, Direct was positioned as free.
Today, platforms monetise through subscriptions, advisory fees, premium tiers, and cross-sell models and some are even shifting to regular plans.
The Structural Shift: Platform Monetisation
The economics never disappeared — they have simply become explicit. Infrastructure, technology, compliance, and research cannot operate at zero revenue indefinitely. Free access was a growth strategy; sustainable models require predictable revenue.
Several digital platforms (https://tinyurl.com/25n29f87) that initially positioned themselves strongly around Direct plans have gradually broadened their models — including offering regular plans alongside advisory monetisation.
This reflects a broader industry shift: platforms are no longer operating on a purely Direct-only proposition — revenue models are becoming more diversified and explicit.
Different paths. Same reality: Sustainable revenue is necessary.
But the economics of the industry are evolving. AUM Data is now showing some interesting statistics
What is the AUM data revealing?
(Equity AUM analysed: ₹32.36 lakh crore across 501 schemes)
Cost Dispersion Is already compressed
When measured as TER (Regular) minus TER (Direct):
88% of the AUM has a gap of 1.25%
Only 2% AUM carries a gap of 1.5% and higher
21% reflects a gap of below 0.75%
The loudest debate represents the smallest pool of capital.
Even new entrants recognise this
Jio BlackRock Asset Management, initially expected to lean heavily on a digital-direct model, begins approaching distributors (as reported by Mint)
Even historically direct-focused players like Quantum Mutual Fund eventually adopted distributor participation.
Mutual Funds are not bought like bank deposits; an investor needs to be convinced about the product.
Final Takeaway
If you can manage asset allocation; taxation implication; rebalancing; risk profiling and above all behavioural patience on your own, then Do it Yourself else seek professional help.
Importantly, SEBI has made commission structures more progressive.
As AUM grows → TER reduces
Large schemes automatically operate at lower payout ratios.
So, the real question for the investor:
Is the value delivered worth the cost that you are paying?

Should you bond with Bonds - Caveat Emptor
2 min Read Feb 27, 2026
Dichotomy of an Indian Investor
2 min Read Jan 2, 2026
The mirage of Alpha
2 min Read Dec 25, 2025
Flexi Caps: Are they true to Label?
2 min Read Dec 8, 2025
Small Caps: The segment we all debate but hardly decode
2 min Read Dec 4, 2025
SEBI Life Cycle Funds Explained: Asset Allocation & Long-Term Investment Strategy
2 min Read Feb 27, 2026
Should you bond with Bonds - Caveat Emptor
2 min Read Feb 27, 2026
Omnitech Engineering IPO 2026 Opens Feb 25: ₹583 Crore Issue, Price Band ₹216–227, Listing on NSE & BSE
2 min Read Feb 25, 2026
Why FPIs Are Pouring into PSU Banks While Selling Other Indian Sectors in 2026 – Improved Asset Quality, Mergers & Stake Dilution Drive the Rally
2 min Read Feb 23, 2026
PNGS Reva IPO Opens Feb 24; ₹380 Crore Upcoming IPO
2 min Read Feb 23, 2026